The Financial Times in an article by Telis Demos in New York City reports in
LinkedIn shares dip on profit-taking that after an initial public offering of $45 per share, which zoomed as high as $122 on the first day of trading, that the stock dipped to $93.09 on the second day of trading due to profit-taking. For those smart enough to buy low and sell high, this was a quick way to double your money or better. Some of those same traders may now reportedly be looking to see how they can short the stock, so that a solid LinkedIn marekt valuation may still be up in the air. Who really knows?
The initial $45 price was apparently determined by valueing LinkedIn at ca. 17 times its past year of sales (2010) -- the price-to-sales ratio--
according to Maggie Shiels at BBC News, whereas the short-term high of $122 per share represented 39 times the annual sales. Demos reports that Facebook trades in private markets at a price which would value the company at ca. 30 times annual sales, according to Nyppex. On the other hand, as reported by Maggie Shiels at BBC News in
LinkedIn share price raises bubble fears, Google trades at only 6 times its annual sales, whereas
the DealBook at the New York Times notes that Facebook of China went public in May and currently trades at 70 times the price-to-sales ratio. At least that gives one some reference points on the present market-based stock value of social networking sites.
Please be advised that this is not an offer to sell securities nor is it advice of any kind on stock purchasing or selling. It is merely a commentary on the LinkedIn IPO. We make make no guarantees or warranties of accuracy about anything since we report everything second-hand. Markets can fluctuate wildly. Caveat emptor.