Friday, November 02, 2012

Samsung Galaxy Tab Does Not Infringe Apple Registered EU Design On Rectangle With Rounded Corners: High Court of England and Wales Orders Apple to Post Text On Its Website to Make it Clear The Judgment Applies Throughout the European Union

This posting adds detail to our preceding posting at LawPundit.

For more than a year, we have been posting at LawPundit about the absurdity of the various court injunctions issued against Samsung Galaxy Tab products in favor of Apple, and we can now report to have -- again -- been juridically right all along.

This posting discusses a court-ordered notice required of Apple by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, with the image of the newspaper version of the notice linked from The Next Web:

.

As can be read above, the Apple company was ordered by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales to post a statement on its website that the High Court had found that Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple's EU registered design No. 0000181607-0001 on a rectangle with rounded corners.

See the judgment, which is applicable throughout the entire European Union.

Apple, apparently thinking it is above the law, did not leave it at that in its court-ordered website posting but added extraneous text alleging Samsung infringements of Apple products in other countries -- inclusion of which was clearly improper, since the court decision in question ONLY involved the question of whether Samsung's Galaxy Tab infringed upon the EU design registered by Apple, which the Court in the judgment written by Sir Robin Jacob found it clearly DID NOT (we excerpt the judgment):
  1. "So this case is all about, and only about, Apple's registered design and the Samsung products. The registered design is not the same as the design of the iPad. It is quite a lot different....

  2. Other disputes between the parties in other countries have concerned other intellectual property rights. We are not concerned with any of them....
The Netherlands
On June 27th 2011 Apple applied for a preliminary injunction in respect of all three Samsung tablets. It was refused at first instance and on appeal. Apple has an outstanding petition to the Supreme Court on a point of law. On 8th September 2011 Samsung issued a claim for a declaration of non-infringement which is on-going.
Spain
Samsung issued a claim for a declaration of non-infringement on 8th September 2011. The claim is ongoing. Apple are challenging jurisdiction. How far that can get is perhaps questionable given that before it did so it entered a defence on the merits. It may well be that the proceedings have now been overtaken by events in that there is a European-wide declaration of non-infringement granted by HHJ Birss and upheld by this judgment. No preliminary injunction has been sought in Spain and none is in force. [emphasis added by LawPundit]
Germany
On 4th August 2011 Apple applied ex parte for a preliminary injunction in relation to the 10.1. It was granted without Samsung having an opportunity of being heard. Moreover it was granted on a pan-European basis. The defendants were SEC ["SEC"=Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd] and its local German subsidiary. Subsequently the injunction was restricted to Germany as regards SEC. [bracketed material added by LawPundit]
On 24th October 2011 the Landgericht Düsseldorf granted a pan-European injunction (excluding Germany) which included the 7.7 but not the 10.1 against SEC's German subsidiary but refused such an injunction as against SEC in respect of the 7.7. Apple appealed the decision to refuse pan-European relief against SEC.
The registered design injunctions in respect of the 10.1 and 8.9 were set aside on appeal in January 2012.... [emphasis added by LawPundit]
The USA
In the Californian proceedings where a number of patents (both design and invention software patents) were in issue, we were told the jury held that Samsung's products did not infringe the design patent corresponding to the registered design we are considering ("design patent" is the US terminology for what in Europe is called a "registered design"). The laws as to infringement differ somewhat.

6. The upshot of all this is that there is now no injunction anywhere based on the registered design or its equivalent....[emphasis added by LawPundit]
The High Court has now given Apple 48 hours to put up proper text and take down the improper text it previously posted. Apple has alleged that putting up new text in that time period could not be done:
"Apple was required to alter and change the positioning of its statement from a small linked page, to an apology on the front page of its website, which needs to be printed in 11-pt Arial font."
See Tech Crunch and Apple Removes "Incorrect" Legal Statement From U.K. Website Following Court Order In iPad Vs. Galaxy Tab Case.

As Natasha Lomas writes there:
"... Sir Robin Jacob ... is reported to have added: "I would like to see the head of Apple make an affidavit about why [compliance with the order] is such a technical difficulty for the Apple company." [bracketed material added by LawPundit]
NO ONE is above the law. Also not the monopolist Apple.


Apple May Think it is Above the Law But a UK Court Disagrees: Judge Would Like to See Affidavit from Company Head About its Alleged Technical Difficulty in Complying with Court Orders

Above the law?

Apple was ordered by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales to post a statement on its website that the High Court had found that Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple’s registered design No. 0000181607-0001. See the judgment.

Apple did not leave it at that in its website posting but added extraneous text to the court-ordered statement alleging Samsung infringements in other countries -- inclusion of which was clearly improper.

A United Kingdom Court thus now has given Apple 48 hours to put up proper text and take down the improper text. Apple has alleged that putting up new text in that time period could not be done [it has been done in newspapers in the interim]. As written at The Next Web:
"Apple was required to alter and change the positioning of its statement from a small linked page, to an apology on the front page of its website, which needs to be printed in 11-pt Arial font."
See Tech Crunch and Apple Removes “Incorrect” Legal Statement From U.K. Website Following Court Order In iPad Vs. Galaxy Tab Case.

As Natasha Lomas writes there:
"... Sir Robin Jacob, is reported to have added: “I would like to see the head of Apple make an affidavit about why [compliance with the order] is such a technical difficulty for the Apple company.”"

Big Storms and Big Government: Romney's Idea that Local Agencies and Private Companies Can Handle Hurricanes like Sandy is Simply Absurd: GOP Needs to Return to a Politics of Reality

See the New York Times editorial at A Big Storm Requires Big Government.

The idea that local government agencies and the "private sector", as Romney has stated, can handle things like gigantic hurricanes, is simply absurd.

On many key issues, Romney is a wide-eyed dreamer whose ideas have no bearing to reality.

Surely the Republicans in future elections can do better than this.

The GOP has always prided itself on being the "pragmatic" party.

So where are the pragmatic leaders
and where is the common sense leadership?

Political idiocy is not something we support.

The idea that individual States should manage disasters that cut across numerous State lines is simply political stupidity at the highest level.

We have nothing against many conservative and libertarian GOP principles, and much of government can be streamlined for sure, but you do not start with disaster relief, which is essential at the national and federal level, as Hurricane Sandy clearly proves.

You can't have "good old boy" local town councils deciding independently when the right time to evacuate their town might be in the case of hurricanes, or expect "the private sector" -- monopolists like Apple -- to finance disaster relief and cleanup. Such companies have little interest in the welfare of the country.

What the GOP needs to do is to get the dogmatic dreamers whose politics consist of theories rooted in past centuries out of party leadership and put new people into positions of leadership who have some sane policies on how to run and finance government in the modern era.


Grover Cleveland As One of America's Worst Presidents Opposed Federal Disaster Relief as "Paternalism" and It Was Devastating to the Country When Hurricanes Struck

We read in disbelief -- see the link at our previous posting at LawPundit -- that U.S. Presidential candidate Mitt Romney opposes disaster relief by the federal government.

Grover Cleveland, one of America's worst presidents, had a similar belief, and it was devastating to the people when hurricane disaster actually struck.

Matthew Algeo has the story at the New York Times in

Grover Cleveland’s Hurricane.

LawPundit Post Archive

The ISandIS Network

Our Websites and Blogs: 3D Printing and More 99 is not 100 Aabecis AK Photo Blog Ancient Egypt Weblog Ancient Signs (the book) Ancient World Blog AndisKaulins.com Anthropomorphic Design Archaeology Travel Photos (blog) Archaeology Travel Photos (Flickr) Archaeo Pundit Arts Pundit Astrology and Birth Baltic Coachman Bible Pundit Biotechnology Pundit Book Pundit Chronology of the Ancient World Computer Pundit DVD Pundit Easter Island Script Echolat edu.edu Einstein’s Voice Energy Environment and Climate Blog Etruscan Bronze Liver of Piacenza EU Laws EU Legal EU Pundit FaceBook Pundit Gadget Pundit Garden Pundit Golf Pundit Google Pundit Gourmet Pundit Hand Proof HousePundit Human Migrations Idea Pundit Illyrian Language Indus Valley Script Infinity One : The Secret of the First Disk (the game) Jostandis Journal Pundit Kaulins Genealogy Blog Kaulinsium Kiel & Kieler Latvian Blog LawPundit.com Law Pundit Blog LexiLine.com LexiLine Group Lexiline Journal Library Pundit Lingwhizt LinkedIn Literary Pundit Magnifichess Make it Music Maps and Cartography Megalithic World Megaliths Blog) Megaliths.net Minoan Culture Mutatis Mutandis Nanotech Pundit Nostratic Languages Official Pundit Phaistos Disc Pharaonic Hieroglyphs Photo Blog of the World Pinterest Prehistoric Art Pundit Private Wealth Blog PunditMania Quanticalian Quick to Travel Quill Pundit Road Pundit Shelfari SlideShare (akaulins) Sport Pundit Star Pundit Stars Stones and Scholars (blog) Stars Stones and Scholars (book) Stonehenge Pundit The Enchanted Glass Twitter Pundit UbiquitousPundit Vision of Change VoicePundit WatchPundit Wine Pundit Word Pundit xistmz YahooPundit zistmz