Saturday, August 06, 2011

The Equitable Non-Tax One-Day Solution to the US National Debt of $15 Trillion: Assess an 8% Equity Contribution on ALL Total Assets of $188 Trillion in America Regardless of Ownership

There is an equitable one-day solution to the US National Debt of ca. $15 Trillion and that is to simply assess an across-the-board 8% "equity contribution" on ALL total assets -- regardless of ownership -- of $188 Trillion in America. Note that $15 Trillion is 8% of $188 Trillion. Some estimate the total asset figure may be as high as $300-$400 Trillion, which, if that were the case on the day of record for asset valuation, would reduce the equity contribution to only about 4%.

Nothing could be more fair than this solution as it would equitably -- no progressive assessments -- eliminate the total national debt in ONE DAY -- i.e. the "day of record" for determining the ownership of any and all assets and their value. Under this system, no asset could be hidden from valuation and each asset would have to have an owner of record on the record day, who would be responsible for paying the 8%.

The beauty of this system is that no person is taxed anything at all. The equity contribution is made on ASSETS, regardless of ownership. The owner of record is responsible to pay the equity contribution, which is a one-time payment to wipe out the national debt. After that, the nation would be "clean".

This solution would also apply to institutions such as religions and foundations, who pay no taxes and thus ride free on the US economy to the detriment of those who have to work for a living and who have to pick up the bill for everyone -- inlcuding religions and foundations -- if taxation is the method of government financing. The "equity contribution" solves that problem. No tax here, just an "equity contribution" based on assets.

Robert J. Shapiro, Ph.D. and Aparna Mathur, Ph.D. in The Social and Economic Value of Private and Community Foundations (Sonecon, December 2008), write that:
"From 1997 to 2007, foundation giving soared from $16.0 billion to $42.9 billion..., while total foundation assets grew from $329.9 billion to $669.5 billion..... By 2007, the assets of U.S. private and community foundations were equal in value to all of the fixed assets of the American agriculture, mining, and utility industries; and foundation giving in that year exceeded the GDP of 110 of the 180 countries tracked by the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank."
To show how "equitable" the "equity contribution" solution is, U.S. foundations, who found it no problem to freely disperse $42.9 billion tax-free in 2007, would thus have an "equity contribution" of $53.6 billion, a sum that they can easily provide to bring the nation that permits them to prosper -- tax-free -- back into financial solvency.

Religions are tax havens, not unlike offshore investment paradises. An institution such as the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormon Church) has amassed total church assets of ca. $30 billion (tax-free) and may generate as much as $20 billion in annual revenues (all tax-free). The Mormon Church would have to make an equity contribution of $2.4 billion to eliminate the national debt and to support the nation that permits them to operate the way they do, but for which their church pays no taxes. They are riding free on the backs of those taxpayers, many NOT Mormons, who DO pay taxes.

The Roman Catholic Church, financed by 1 billion members, is by far the richest organization in the world, all tax-free. In 1994 the Vatican Bank had deposits of $40 billion and that amount will be much higher today, also in the USA and its assets. Just consider that the total amount paid by the Roman Catholic Church to settle sexual abuse cases is currently approaching $3 billion. Not only does the American taxpayer indirectly finance these escapades, but, as written at by Austin Cline:
"The assets of the Roman Catholic church alone exceed those of the five largest American corporations combined and cash donations to churches total tens of billions of dollars every year.

Every dollar not paid by churches or other religious organizations must be made up from some other source. When all tax exemptions are taken into account, it is estimated that the average family may pay up to $1,000 in extra taxes every year to make up for the lost revenue not received from churches and religious groups. This includes sales taxes, inheritance taxes, income taxes, personal taxes, and ad valorem taxes."
Under the "equity contribution" program for eliminating the US national debt in one day, the assets of ALL churches would be counted and assessed 8%, and each church would thus finally be paying their fair share for the American government system that enables them to exist and prosper.

Any questions? Or is this too simple for today's modern man, who prefers convoluted, complex and often, in the last analysis, ineffective solutions.

Polls Show Obama the Winner and Congress the Big Loser in Debt Ceiling Fiasco

If new candidates for Congress play their cards right, a great number of incumbent Congresspersons should be worried about collecting unemployment checks after the next election.

As Michael Cooper and Megan Thee-Brenan write at the New York Times, a New York times/CBS News Poll finds that the Public Views Congress as Top Culprit in Debt Debate.

A phenomenal 82% of Americans disapprove how Congress is doing its job.

Republicans suffered a greater image loss than the Democrats and the TeaParty movement was seen much more unfavorably now than several months ago.

Obama, on the other hand, wound up the debt ceiling debate with a 47% to 46% approval to disapproval rate.

The poll also found that those polled found putting people back to work to be the top priority and increasing taxes on high income earners to be desirable (63%) to help cut the budget deficit.

Whatever political advantages the Republicans may have gained in past months, they lost them in the catastrophic debt ceiling debate and then some.

Patent Sanity: Europe is Not America: European Patent Office Rejects Amazon One-Click Patent as Too Obvious to Patent

Amazon's 'one-click' payment method too obvious to patent, European Patent Office rules | Pinsent Masons LLP
"Amazon had hoped to patent the way its customers pay for products through the click of a single web page button. The company was previously granted patent rights to the payment system in the US."

Privacy Rights: One Face Picture Enough to Access Mass of Personal Information

See Jacob Aron, technology reporter at the New Scientist and One Per Cent: Taking the Sweat Out of Technology in the posting Facial recognition.

Spotify Sued for Patent Infringement Upon Arriving in the United States: Welcome to America! Land of the Patent Trolls

One of the problems with the patent mess is that people in Congress and in the courts have no conception of what is going on out in the field.

Jordan Crook at Tech Crunch in Just As Spotify Settles Into The U.S. Lifestyle It Gets Sued For Patent Infringement writes:
"Within fourteen days of arriving stateside, PacketVideo has filed a patent infringement suit against Europe’s prized music service. For what, you ask? Streaming music."
As Crook writes:
"[I]ts music streaming service falls under the incredibly broad category of a “device for the distribution of music information in digital form,” the title of the patent....

the key claim:
“a central memory device which is connected to a communications network and has a databank of digitized music information and, a terminal which is connected to the central memory device via the communications network, the central memory device being equipped with a retrieval module and the said modules having the capability to interact via the communications network in order to order and transmit selectively chosen music information, wherein the selectively chosen music information is organized with a defined format for transmission in a digital music information object, the format including a core and a number of additional layers, the core including at least one object identification code, object structure information, a consumer code and an encryption table and the one or more additional layers including the actual music information, wherein the central memory device has an encryption module for encryption of the music information object before transmission using the encryption table, and wherein the terminal has a decryption module for decryption of the music information object before its reproduction using the encryption table, an interpretation module for interpretation and reproduction conditioning of the music information object as well as an authorization device having identification information for identification of the terminal and of the consumer which is retrievable by the interpretation module and by the decryption module for authorization checking.”"
Of course, no one is using any device that these alleged inventors invented. The use of the Internet to send music or any other information in digital form is obvious to any idiot. It was the original idea of the first Internet networks to use the Internet to carry all sorts of information and in all forms -- NOTHING was invented here. All the Internet operates by packets. Only the clueless wonders at the USPTO granted patents for this kind of nonsense.

Can it also be that numerous judges in the American judicial system simply are unable to recognize an overbroad and improperly granted patent when they see one? Can they not see that a broken patent system is enabling people to collect money for IDEAS and not for products they have actually invented? It is law as a scam, of the worst sort.

People Don't Like to be Configured: Danah Boyd at Apophenia Speaks Out on Designing for Social Norms (or How Not to Create Angry Mobs)

This lady is right on and this must be one of the best posts on this topic out there. Make sure you read it. At least, that is my suggestion.

I can't count the number of times this year that I have been "angry" or needlessly "irritated" because of software and design changes in programs that I regularly use. Changes THAT I DO NOT WANT are trying to be forced upon me by people who think they know better than I do what is good for me. NOT.

Take a look at danah boyd | apophenia in Designing for Social Norms (or How Not to Create Angry Mobs), as she writes:
"[W]hen you start with a heavy-handed regulatory policy that is not driven by social norms – as Google Plus did – the backlash is intense....

People don’t like to be configured. They don’t like to be forcibly told how they should use a service. They don’t want to be told to behave like the designers intended them to be. Heavy-handed policies don’t make for good behavior; they make for [angry] users." [emphasis added]
There is a lesson there for many spheres of life: social, legal, political, economical, and personal. I am thinking I have to improve on this score myself.

The ISandIS Network

Our Websites and Blogs: 3D Printing and More 99 is not 100 Aabecis AK Photo Blog Ancient Egypt Weblog Ancient Signs (the book) Ancient World Blog Anthropomorphic Design Archaeology Travel Photos (blog) Archaeology Travel Photos (Flickr) Archaeo Pundit Arts Pundit Astrology and Birth Baltic Coachman Bible Pundit Biotechnology Pundit Book Pundit Chronology of the Ancient World Computer Pundit DVD Pundit Easter Island Script Echolat Einstein’s Voice Energy Environment and Climate Blog Etruscan Bronze Liver of Piacenza EU Laws EU Legal EU Pundit FaceBook Pundit Gadget Pundit Garden Pundit Golf Pundit Google Pundit Gourmet Pundit Hand Proof HousePundit Human Migrations Idea Pundit Illyrian Language Indus Valley Script Infinity One : The Secret of the First Disk (the game) Jostandis Journal Pundit Kaulins Genealogy Blog Kaulinsium Kiel & Kieler Latvian Blog Law Pundit Blog LexiLine Group Lexiline Journal Library Pundit Lingwhizt LinkedIn Literary Pundit Magnifichess Make it Music Maps and Cartography Megalithic World Megaliths Blog) Minoan Culture Mutatis Mutandis Nanotech Pundit Nostratic Languages Official Pundit Phaistos Disc Pharaonic Hieroglyphs Photo Blog of the World Pinterest Prehistoric Art Pundit Private Wealth Blog PunditMania Quanticalian Quick to Travel Quill Pundit Road Pundit Shelfari SlideShare (akaulins) Sport Pundit Star Pundit Stars Stones and Scholars (blog) Stars Stones and Scholars (book) Stonehenge Pundit The Enchanted Glass Twitter Pundit UbiquitousPundit Vision of Change VoicePundit WatchPundit Wine Pundit Word Pundit xistmz YahooPundit zistmz